What is false about existing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)?

The reason B is considered a false statement about existing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) is that it incorrectly specifies a rigid review timeline of two years for demo operations. Typically, SOPs should be responsive to changes in operational requirements and best practices, which may necessitate more frequent reviews. As a result, while some SOPs might have a general guideline indicating a review period, the nature of many operational environments often requires updates based on lessons learned from recent operations and changes in regulations or technology.

On the other hand, the other statements establish fundamental principles for maintaining effective SOPs. Annual reviews are a common best practice to ensure SOPs remain relevant and incorporate any new developments. Updating SOPs after each operation allows for immediate incorporation of insights gained during those operations, reinforcing the idea that SOPs should be living documents. Finally, reflecting current best practices is essential for ensuring that procedures remain effective and legally compliant, keeping the organization aligned with industry standards. This continuous evolution is vital for maintaining operational efficiency and safety.