Which of the following is NOT a goal of the hazard control evaluation process?

The goal of the hazard control evaluation process primarily revolves around understanding and improving the effectiveness of hazard controls in an organization. Each goal in this context aims to ensure that risks are identified, properly managed, and assessed for their effectiveness in mitigating hazards.

Identifying hazards is crucial as it lays the foundation for recognizing potential risks present in the workplace. This step ensures that any control measures developed are relevant and targeted at known risks.

Assessing implementation refers to examining whether the established hazard control measures have been effectively put into practice. This aspect is essential for recognizing whether the intended interventions are actually reducing risks as planned.

Evaluating effectiveness is about determining whether the implemented controls are achieving the desired outcomes in terms of risk reduction. This evaluation helps in understanding if adjustments are needed to improve safety measures further.

Conversely, evaluating sources of funding is not a direct goal of the hazard control evaluation process. While funding is important for ensuring that necessary safety measures can be implemented and maintained, it does not directly relate to assessing hazard control effectiveness or addressing the core safety goals within the evaluation process. Therefore, it stands apart from the primary objectives aimed at hazard control evaluation, making it the correct choice for what is not a goal of this process.